Using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination for Bachelor of Midwifery students' preparation for practice

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Mitchell, Marion L
Jeffrey, Carol A
Henderson, Amanda
Glover, Pauline
Nulty, Duncan D
Kelly, Michelle A
Groves, Michele
Knight, Sabina
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

Kathleen Fahy

Date
2014
Size

880680 bytes

File type(s)

application/pdf

Location
License
Abstract

Background: Contemporary midwifery practice needs a rigorous and standardised assessment of practical skills, and knowledge to ensure that safety is maintained for both women and neonates before, during and after childbirth. Aim: To evaluate the use of Best Practice Guidelines (BPG) for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE) as a standardised tool to develop clinical competence of Bachelor of Midwifery students. Method: A pragmatic mixed method approach with surveys, focus groups and interviews was used to evaluate the OSCEs for first year students. Quantitative and qualitative data were combined to understand student and academic perceptions of students' confidence for clinical practice following the OSCE. Findings: Thirty-four students responded to surveys (response rate 94%); and 13 participated in focus groups. Two academic lecturers participated in an interview (100%). Two main themes emerged (1) the OSCEs improved student confidence (2) the OSCEs were relevant and prepared students for practice. Most students indicated that they practised for the OSCE using an integrated approach (70%), and that this assisted them in their approach to the assessment of the neonate or post-partum mother. Conclusion: The use of BPGs to ensure that OSCEs focus on important aspects of knowledge and practice helped students to learn and to perform well. Students' confidence in their ability for the imminent professional experience placement was high. OSCEs designed with the BPGs should be implemented broadly across midwifery education to enhance students' competence and provide rigorous meaningful assessment.

Journal Title

Women and Birth

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

27

Issue

2

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2013 Elsevier. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Nursing not elsewhere classified

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections