The Doctrine of Penalties and the Test of Commercial Justification

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Baron, Paula
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2008
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

The doctrine of penalties has long been a contentious area of the law. One reason for this is that court intervention to strike down an agreed sum is seen to be inconsistent with freedom of contract. The recent High Court case of Ringrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia sought to confine court intervention to situations where an agreed sum is 'out of all proportion' to the likely loss. In the United Kingdom, recent decisions have applied the 'commercial justification' test to determine the validity of an agreed sums clause. The purpose of this paper is to consider this new United Kingdom line ofauthority. Can the commercial justfication test address some of the ongoing criticisms of the doctrine of penalties?

Journal Title
University of Western Australia Law Review
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
34
Issue
1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Commercial and Contract Law
Law
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections