The dose response relationship in psychotherapy: Implications for social policy

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Harnett, Paul
O'Donovan, Analise
Lambert, Michael J
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2010
Size

110127 bytes

File type(s)

application/pdf

Location
License
Abstract

The principle aim of this study was to estimate the number of sessions of psychotherapy needed for clients suffering from psychiatric illness to return to a normal state of functioning or reliably improve. This would be helpful for treatment planning and policy decisions regarding how much therapy is enough. The progress of 125 clients entering psychological treatment in two university training clinics was tracked on a session-by-session basis using a naturalistic design. Recovery and reliable improvement were the bi-nomial events of interest used in a survival analysis that estimated the number of weekly treatment sessions needed to meet criteria. Using survival analysis it was estimated that it would take about 8 sessions for 50% of clients to show reliable improvement and 21 sessions for about 85% to meet this criterion. Recovery took more treatment, with 50% of clients estimated to recover after 14 sessions and 70% requiring 23. On the basis of the present results we conclude that the present policy of the Australian Government in both the public and private sector regarding the number of sessions needed for clients entering psychological treatments to show a benefit is much less than is, in fact, necessary. The findings of the current study are roughly consistent with those found elsewhere and suggest a minimum benefit should be closer to 20 sessions. The current policy appears to be suitable for only about one-third of clients who carry the burden of psychological illness.

Journal Title

Clinical Psychologist

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

14

Issue

2

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2010 Australian Psychological Society. Published by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an electronic version of an article published in Clinical Psychologist, Volume 14, Issue 2 July 2010 , pages 39 - 44. Clinical Psychologist is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com with the open URL of your article.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Cognitive and computational psychology

Applied and developmental psychology

Clinical and health psychology

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections