Aim: To test the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling, goal-directed training, and adapted cycling, compared with usual care, to improve function in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Method: The intervention was delivered between 2017 and 2019 and included three sessions per week for 8 weeks (2×1h sessions at a children’s hospital, and 1h home programme/week). Hospital sessions included 30 minutes of FES cycling and 30 minutes of goal-directed training. Home programmes included goal-directed training and adapted cycling. The comparison group continued usual care. Primary outcomes were gross motor function assessed by the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) and goal performance/satisfaction assessed using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Secondary outcomes were sit-to-stand and activity capacity, participation in home, school, and community activities, and power output. Linear regression was used to determine the between-group mean difference immediately post-training completion after adjusting for baseline scores. Results: This randomized controlled trial included 21 participants (mean age=10y 3mo, standard deviation [SD]=3y; Gross Motor Function Classification System level: II=7, III=6, IV=8) who were randomized to the intervention (n=11) or usual care group (n=10). Between-group differences at T2 favoured the intervention group for GMFM-88 (mean difference=7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3–12.6; p=0.007), GMFM-66 (mean difference=5.9; 95% CI: 3.1–8.8; p<0.001), COPM performance (mean difference=4.4; 95% CI: 3.9–5.3; p<0.001) and satisfaction (mean difference=5.2; 95% CI: 4.0–6.4; p<0.001). Interpretation: Children with CP achieved meaningful functional improvements after FES cycling, goal-directed training, and adapted cycling training. Cycling programmes for children with CP should be individualized and goal directed.