Author's response to "High-flow nasal cannula therapy: An un-tapped resource" (Letter)
File version
Author(s)
Eastwood, Glenn M
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Dear Sir,
Thank-you for your interest in our study and we are grateful for the opportunity to respond to your comments. In HFNC naïve units there is the opportunity to perform efficacy studies associated with the introduction of this mode of oxygen delivery toward particular patient populations. Our study differed as it purposefully sought to determine the feasibility, safety and cost-effectiveness of introducing a protocol in which HFNC was the primary oxygen delivery device in a unit in which HFNC was not uniformly applied
Journal Title
Australian Critical Care
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
29
Issue
1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Clinical sciences
Nursing
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Critical Care Medicine
General & Internal Medicine
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Fealy, N; Eastwood, GM, Author's response to "High-flow nasal cannula therapy: An un-tapped resource", Australian Critical Care, 2016, 29 (1), pp. 4-4