Author's response to "High-flow nasal cannula therapy: An un-tapped resource" (Letter)

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Fealy, Nigel
Eastwood, Glenn M
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2016
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Dear Sir,

Thank-you for your interest in our study and we are grateful for the opportunity to respond to your comments. In HFNC naïve units there is the opportunity to perform efficacy studies associated with the introduction of this mode of oxygen delivery toward particular patient populations. Our study differed as it purposefully sought to determine the feasibility, safety and cost-effectiveness of introducing a protocol in which HFNC was the primary oxygen delivery device in a unit in which HFNC was not uniformly applied

Journal Title

Australian Critical Care

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

29

Issue

1

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Clinical sciences

Nursing

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Critical Care Medicine

General & Internal Medicine

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Fealy, N; Eastwood, GM, Author's response to "High-flow nasal cannula therapy: An un-tapped resource", Australian Critical Care, 2016, 29 (1), pp. 4-4

Collections