Franchisee advisory councils and justice: franchisees finding their voice
File version
Author(s)
Frazer, L
Weaven, S
Perkins, H
Shao, W
Nyadzayo, M
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Drawing on the four dimensions of justice: distributive, procedural, interactional, and informational justice, this research examines justice as an antecedent of franchisee performance. Empirical research tested a theoretical model using structural equation modelling techniques. Our results show significant support for two of the four dimensions: distributive and interpersonal justice. Furthermore, our model tested, and found support for the moderation of franchisee membership in the Franchisee Advisory Council (FAC). Perceptions of distributive justice is considered the most important contributor to franchisees’ perceived performance in franchise systems that endorse and actively participate with the FAC through membership. Thus, one major implication of this research is the moderation effect of membership of the FAC on the influence of justice on franchisees’ perceptions of positive performance outcomes. This speaks to the FAC’s particular importance for facilitating best practice, strong, and financially viable franchise systems.
Journal Title
Journal of Strategic Marketing
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
This publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version.
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Marketing
Marketing management (incl. strategy and customer relations)
Strategy, management and organisational behaviour
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Grace, A; Frazer, L; Weaven, S; Perkins, H; Shao, W; Nyadzayo, M, Franchisee advisory councils and justice: franchisees finding their voice, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 2020