The paranoid style of American elections: explaining perceptions of electoral integrity in an age of populism
File version
Author(s)
Garnett, HA
Grömping, M
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Polls report that, contrary to the evidence, one quarter of Americans believe that millions of illegal votes were cast in the 2016 elections. What explains these types of beliefs? This article tests the predictors of public evaluations of electoral integrity in the 2016 American Presidential election, as measured by judgements about the fairness of the voting processes in the 2016 American National Election Study. We demonstrate that conspiratorial beliefs and populist values contribute towards citizens’ electoral mistrust. The results suggest that the paranoid style of American politics is alive and well in contemporary US elections.
Journal Title
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
30
Issue
1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Policy and administration
Political science
Comparative government and politics
Social Sciences
Government & Law
PUBLIC-OPINION
VOTER
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Norris, P; Garnett, HA; Grömping, M, The paranoid style of American elections: explaining perceptions of electoral integrity in an age of populism, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 2020, 30 (1), pp. 105-125