The paranoid style of American elections: explaining perceptions of electoral integrity in an age of populism

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Norris, P
Garnett, HA
Grömping, M
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Polls report that, contrary to the evidence, one quarter of Americans believe that millions of illegal votes were cast in the 2016 elections. What explains these types of beliefs? This article tests the predictors of public evaluations of electoral integrity in the 2016 American Presidential election, as measured by judgements about the fairness of the voting processes in the 2016 American National Election Study. We demonstrate that conspiratorial beliefs and populist values contribute towards citizens’ electoral mistrust. The results suggest that the paranoid style of American politics is alive and well in contemporary US elections.

Journal Title

Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

30

Issue

1

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Policy and administration

Political science

Comparative government and politics

Social Sciences

Government & Law

PUBLIC-OPINION

VOTER

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Norris, P; Garnett, HA; Grömping, M, The paranoid style of American elections: explaining perceptions of electoral integrity in an age of populism, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 2020, 30 (1), pp. 105-125

Collections