Academic freedom, achievement standards and professional identity
File version
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Lee Harvey
Date
Size
92475 bytes
File type(s)
application/pdf
Location
License
Abstract
The tension between the freedom of academics to grade the achievements of their students without interference or coercion and the prerogative of higher education institutions to control grading standards is often deliberated by weighing up the authority and rights of the two parties. An alternative approach is to start with an analysis of the characteristics necessary for a system to exhibit integrity in grading academic achievement, and treat the establishment and maintenance of academic standards as a problem to be solved. This would allow the respective responsibilities of academics and institutions to be resolved within a concrete setting rather than in the abstract. Connecting the typical characteristics of a profession with Isaiah Berlin's two concepts of liberty leads to a productive partnership in which the respective interests of individual academics and the values of institutions can converge on a practical solution to the problem of academic freedom.
Journal Title
Quality in Higher Education
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
17
Issue
1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2011 Routledge. This is an electronic version of an article published in Quality in Higher Education, Volume 17, Issue 1, 2011 , Pages 85-100. Quality in Higher Education is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com with the open URL of your article.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Education systems
Other education not elsewhere classified