Interviewing high value detainees: Securing cooperation and disclosures

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Goodman-Delahunty, J
Martschuk, N
Dhami, MK
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2014
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Four types of coercive and noncoercive interview strategies (legalistic, physical, cognitive and social) used to facilitate disclosure by high value detainees were examined in an international sample of practitioners and detainees (N = 64). Predictive analyses confirmed that the accusatorial approach was positively correlated with physically coercive strategies (rs = .58) and negatively with forms of social persuasion (rs = −.31). In response to social strategies, detainees were more likely to disclose meaningful information [odds ratio (OR) = 4.2] and earlier in the interview when rapport‐building techniques were used (OR = 14.17). They were less likely to cooperate when confronted with evidence (OR = 4.8). Disclosures were more complete in response to noncoercive strategies, especially rapport‐building and procedural fairness elements of respect and voice. These findings augmented past theory on interactional processes and the evidence‐base of international best practices in suspect interviews. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Journal Title

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

28

Issue

6

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Marketing

Cognitive and computational psychology

Specialist studies in education

Applied and developmental psychology

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Goodman-Delahunty, J; Martschuk, N; Dhami, MK, Interviewing high value detainees: Securing cooperation and disclosures, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2014, 28 (6), pp. 883-897

Collections