Cannabis extract for secondary prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: Results of a phase II/III, placebo-controlled, randomised trial

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Mersiades, Antony
Kirby, Adrienne
Stockler, Martin R
Tognela, Annette
Olver, Ian N
Morton, Rachael L
Haber, Paul
Walsh, Anna
Lee, Yvonne
Abdi, Ehtesham A
Della-Fiorentina, Stephen
Aghmesheh, Morteza
Fox, Peter
Briscoe, Karen P
Sanmugarajah, Jasotha
et al.
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2023
Size
File type(s)
Location

Chicago, United States

License
Abstract

Background: The aim of this multi-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase II/III trial was to determine the efficacy of adding an oral THC/CBD (tetrahydrocannabinol/cannabidiol) cannabis extract in adults who experience CINV during moderate and highly emetogenic intravenous chemotherapy regimens despite guideline-consistent anti-emetic prophylaxis. The phase II crossover component has been published (Grimison et al, AnnOnc 2020). Here we report the definitive results from the combined phase II/III components with a planned sample size of 250 patients. Methods: For the definitive phase III component, participants were randomised 1:1 to receive, oral THC 2.5mg/CBD 2.5mg (Tilray TN-TC11M) capsules TDS days -1 to 5, or placebo (in addition to guideline-consistent anti-emetics including rescue medications) for cycles A, B and C. Primary endpoint was the difference in gaining a ‘complete response’ (no emesis and no use of rescue medications) during 0-120 hours from chemotherapy for cycle A. Results: Complete response was achieved in 24% and 8% with THC/CBD and placebo, respectively (absolute difference 16%, P-value 0.01). The study closed early due to slow accrual without knowledge of study outcomes, with a total of 147 patients recruited 2016-22 (pilot n=78, definitive n=69). Median age was 56 years (range 25 to 80), 78% were females, 39% reported historic cannabis use, 65% were treated with curative intent. Most common regimens were doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC, 31%), and fluorouracil/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX, 17%), 97% received corticosteroid & 5-HT3 antagonist, 80% received NK-1 antagonist, 10% received olanzapine. Efficacy and safety are shown in the table. No SAEs were attributed to THC/CBD. Conclusions: Oral THC/CBD was associated with a significant increase in the proportion of patients achieving a complete response in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and was well tolerated, representing an effective new treatment in the management of this condition. Future analyses will report quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Funding from NSW Government Dept of Health. Drug supply by Tilray. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12616001036404.

Journal Title

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Conference Title

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting I: Special Clinical Science Symposia

Book Title
Edition
Volume

41

Issue

16_suppl

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Oncology and carcinogenesis

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Oncology

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Mersiades, A; Kirby, A; Stockler, MR; Tognela, A; Olver, IN; Morton, RL; Haber, P; Walsh, A; Lee, Y; Abdi, EA; Della-Fiorentina, S; Aghmesheh, M; Fox, P; Briscoe, KP; Sanmugarajah, J; et al., Cannabis extract for secondary prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: Results of a phase II/III, placebo-controlled, randomised trial, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2023, 41 (16_suppl), pp. 12019