Built environments for inpatient stroke rehabilitation services and care: a systematic literature review

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Lipson-Smith, Ruby
Pflaumer, Luis
Elf, Marie
Blaschke, Sarah-May
Davis, Aaron
White, Marcus
Zeeman, Heidi
Bernhardt, Julie
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2021
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify, appraise and synthesise existing design evidence for inpatient stroke rehabilitation facilities; to identify impacts of these built environments on the outcomes and experiences of people recovering from stroke, their family/caregivers and staff. DESIGN: A convergent segregated review design was used to conduct a systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched for articles published between January 2000 and November 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies investigating the impact of the built environment of inpatient rehabilitation facilities on stroke survivors, their family/caregivers and/or staff. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors separately completed the title, abstract, full-text screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Extracted data were categorised according to the aspect of the built environment explored and the outcomes reported. These categories were used to structure a narrative synthesis of the results from all included studies. RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included, most qualitative and exploratory. Half of the included articles investigated a particular aspect of the built environment, including environmental enrichment and communal areas (n=8), bedroom design (n=3) and therapy spaces (n=1), while the other half considered the environment in general. Findings related to one or more of the following outcome categories: (1) clinical outcomes, (2) patient activity, (3) patient well-being, (4) patient and/or staff safety and (5) clinical practice. Heterogeneous designs and variables of interest meant results could not be compared, but some repeated findings suggest that attractive and accessible communal areas are important for patient activity and well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke rehabilitation is a unique healthcare context where patient activity, practice and motivation are paramount. We found many evidence gaps that with more targeted research could better inform the design of rehabilitation spaces to optimise care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020158006.

Journal Title

BMJ Open

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

11

Issue

8

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Clinical sciences

health services administration & management

rehabilitation medicine

stroke medicine

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Lipson-Smith, R; Pflaumer, L; Elf, M; Blaschke, S-M; Davis, A; White, M; Zeeman, H; Bernhardt, J, Built environments for inpatient stroke rehabilitation services and care: a systematic literature review., BMJ Open, 2021, 11 (8), pp. e050247-

Collections