How to respond to reviewers and revise your article for publication (Editorial)
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Allen, J
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
When you submit a paper for consideration in Women and Birth, it is may be rejected by the Editor ( 70%) or sent to an Associate Editor to manage the peer review process ( 30%). Article rejection is outside the scope of this Editorial, but clearly addressed by Likkis and Swett.1 If the Editor invites authors to revise their submission, it is essential to submit a formal response which demonstrates appropriate revision or rebuttal in response to the reviewers’ comments.
Journal Title
Women and Birth
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
32
Issue
6
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2019 Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Nursing
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Parratt, J; Allen, J, How to respond to reviewers and revise your article for publication (Editorial), Women and Birth, 2019, 32 (6), pp. 477-478