Barriers to recruitment for a post-cancer fatigue intervention study – The tops trial

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Sandler, Carolina
Webber, Kate
Friedlander, Michael
Lewis, Craig
Chin, Melvin
Venkateswaran, Ramya
Segelov, Eva
Bastick, Patricia
Lynch, Jodi
Thomas, David
Liauw, Winston
Boyle, Fran
Goldstein, David
Lloyd, Andrew
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2013
Size
File type(s)
Location

Adelaide, Australia

License
Abstract

Cancer-related fatigue is a distressing and disabling symptom. When cancer-related fatigue persists beyond the treatment period and is unexplained by alternative medical or psychiatric conditions, it is termed post-cancer-fatigue (PCF)1. It has been rated by patients as the most prominent symptom experienced after cancer therapy2. Preliminary data suggest that cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT)3,coupled with graded exercise therapy (GET)4 will improve functional outcomes. A randomised control trial–Treatment of Post-cancer fatigue Study has been developed assigning patients to receiving either an education intervention (n = 50), or a 12-week supervised (by exercise physiologist and psychologist), GET and CBT intervention (n = 50). Potential subjects are screened for clinically-significant fatigue at 3 months post successful-treatment for breast or bowel cancer.

Recruitment began in late 2012 with 158 potential participants approached to date. Recruitment sites include Prince of Wales public (n = 61) and private hospitals (n = 51), St George public and private hospitals (n = 11), Register4 (n = 12) and various private consulting rooms (n = 23). 89 patients have been screened with 38 (43%) deemed eligible, and 22 enrolled, including n = 20 women with breast cancer. 12 patients were eligible but were not enrolled due to other competing time commitments (67%) and 4 in progress. Of the 51(57%) ineligible patients, the major reason for exclusion was sub-threshold fatigue severity (61%). 62 patients are in screening, and 7 have been lost to follow-up.

These limitations in recruitment to date are likely to reflect recent findings that the rate of post-cancer fatigue is lower than previously thought5. Focussing on identification of patients who are at higher risk of sustained fatigue may improve enrolment rates. In contract to pharmacological interventions, behavioural treatment programs have significant time demands which may also limit recruitment.

Journal Title
Conference Title

Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology

Book Title
Edition
Volume

9

Issue

S3

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Oncology and carcinogenesis

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Sandler, C; Webber, K; Friedlander, M; Lewis, C; Chin, M; Venkateswaran, R; Segelov, E; Bastick, P; Lynch, J; Thomas, D; Liauw, W; Boyle, F; Goldstein, D; Lloyd, A, Barriers to recruitment for a post-cancer fatigue intervention study – The tops trial, Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013, 9 (S3), pp. 116-116