Helping or Harming? Compulsory Income Management in Australia and New Zealand
File version
Author(s)
Peterie, Michelle
Marston, Greg
Mendes, Philip
Bielefeld, Shelley
Staines, Zoe
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Income Management (IM) quarantines a portion of welfare recipients’ social security payments, placing these funds in a special account. Quarantined funds cannot be withdrawn as cash and cannot be used to purchase prohibited goods and services such as alcohol, illicit drugs, gambling products or pornography. Compulsory Income Management (CIM) was first introduced to Australia – and, indeed, the world – in 2007 as part of the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) and has been through several incarnations in the decade since. A comparable policy – ‘Money Management’ – was introduced to New Zealand in 2012.
Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
ARC
Grant identifier(s)
DP180101252
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Law in context
Social policy
Sociology
160512 - Social Policy
160799 - Social Work not elsewhere classified
160801 - Applied Sociology, Program Evaluation and Social Impact Assessment
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Humpage, L; Peterie, M; Marston, G; Mendes, P; Bielefeld, S; Staines, Z; Bielefeld, B, Helping or Harming? Compulsory Income Management in Australia and New Zealand, 2020, pp. 1-15