Helping or Harming? Compulsory Income Management in Australia and New Zealand

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Humpage, Louise
Peterie, Michelle
Marston, Greg
Mendes, Philip
Bielefeld, Shelley
Staines, Zoe
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Income Management (IM) quarantines a portion of welfare recipients’ social security payments, placing these funds in a special account. Quarantined funds cannot be withdrawn as cash and cannot be used to purchase prohibited goods and services such as alcohol, illicit drugs, gambling products or pornography. Compulsory Income Management (CIM) was first introduced to Australia – and, indeed, the world – in 2007 as part of the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) and has been through several incarnations in the decade since. A comparable policy – ‘Money Management’ – was introduced to New Zealand in 2012.

Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)

ARC

Grant identifier(s)

DP180101252

Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Law in context

Social policy

Sociology

160512 - Social Policy

160799 - Social Work not elsewhere classified

160801 - Applied Sociology, Program Evaluation and Social Impact Assessment

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Humpage, L; Peterie, M; Marston, G; Mendes, P; Bielefeld, S; Staines, Z; Bielefeld, B, Helping or Harming? Compulsory Income Management in Australia and New Zealand, 2020, pp. 1-15

Collections