Epidemic Orientalism: race, capital, and the governance of infectious disease (Book review)

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Davies, Sara E
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2024
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Epidemic Orientalism presents the persuasive argument that modern international disease control—its governance priorities, its financial mechanisms and its scientific language—is the product, not a by-product, of colonialism. Colonialism, and the empires that supported this practice, sought to define, dictate and control infectious disease containment practices to control trade and movement. As a result, contemporary international disease control will reproduce epidemic Orientalism, even when attempting to promote a collective coordinated response under mechanisms such as the World Health Organization (WHO) International Health Regulations. According to Alexandre White, the concept refers to a ‘way of apprehending and recognizing infectious disease threat that is based on the ways that the West has come to see itself in relation to the rest of the world’ (p. 2).

Journal Title

International Affairs

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

100

Issue

3

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Policy and administration

Political science

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Davies, SE, Epidemic Orientalism: race, capital, and the governance of infectious disease, International Affairs, 2024, 100 (3), pp. 1333-1334

Collections