Does the Nitrification-Suppressed BOD5 Test Make Sense?

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Liu, Changyu
Morrison, Clare
Jia, Jianbo
Xu, Xiaolong
Liu, Minchao
Zhang, Shanqing
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

The presence of dissolved oxygen (DO) in a water body is critical for water quality and the support of aquatic life. Demands on DO via biochemical and chemical degradation of organic and inorganic pollutants are of great importance to water quality management. With this background, the measurement of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) was identified as a good standard indicator of water quality over 100 years ago,1 with lower BOD levels reflecting higher levels of water quality. We argue that the standard BOD-measurement method, ISO 5815-1, is routinely underestimating the DO demand in a water body by employing routine suppression of oxygen demand from the nitrification process of converting ammonium to nitrate. Underestimation of the actual oxygen demand may subsequently cause systemic risk in environmental impact assessments.

Journal Title

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

54

Issue

9

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Environmental sciences

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Engineering, Environmental

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Liu, C; Morrison, C; Jia, J; Xu, X; Liu, M; Zhang, S, Does the Nitrification-Suppressed BOD5 Test Make Sense?, Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2020, 54 (9), pp. 5323-5324

Collections