Democracy, interpretation, and the “problem” of conceptual ambiguity: Reflections on the v-dem project’s struggles with operationalizing deliberative democracy

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Accepted Manuscript (AM)

Author(s)
Boswell, J
Corbett, J
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2021
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Democracy is a notoriously ambiguous concept. Political scientists typically see this ambiguity as a problem that restricts measurement and causal explanation, especially for the comparative study of democratization. Increasingly ambitious data collection efforts and sophisticated methodological approaches attempt to resolve this problem—nowhere more so than in the recent, award-winning, and highly prominent Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) dataset. By contrast, ambiguity and contestation over what democracy actually means is key both to normative theorizing and to the capacity to re-examine and reimagine democratic practice during moments of crisis. Rather than attempting to pin down and measure democratic quality, we highlight instead the value of ambiguity to normative democratic theory and interpretive political science.Weoffer four reflections onV-Dembased on examples fromthe literature on deliberative democracy, which is the discipline’s most prominent attempt to reinvent and reinvigorate democratic practice amid crisis and disaffection. Our aim is not to reignite the paradigm wars or fundamentally question the validity of projects like V-Dem, but rather to illustrate how a more plural approach might augment their theoretical and empirical contribution. We conclude by offering concrete illustrations of what this might look like in practice.

Journal Title

Polity

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

53

Issue

2

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

This work is covered by copyright. You must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a specified licence, refer to the licence for details of permitted re-use. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please make a copyright takedown request using the form at https://www.griffith.edu.au/copyright-matters.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Persistent link to this record
Citation

Boswell, J; Corbett, J, Democracy, interpretation, and the “problem” of conceptual ambiguity: Reflections on the v-dem project’s struggles with operationalizing deliberative democracy, Polity, 2021, 53 (2), pp. 239-263

Collections