The Impact of Journal Ranking Fetishism on Australian Policy-related Research: A Case Study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Young, Suzanne
Peetz, David
Marais, Magalie
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2011
Size

208709 bytes

File type(s)

application/pdf

Location
License
Abstract

In Australia, the Excellence in Research (ERA) exercise, first conducted in 2008 and continuing relatively unchanged in 2012, determines the level of research funding made available to Australian universities (Cooper and Poletti 2011). However the use of rankings is argued to be problematic. Through a survey of academics in a field of policy-relevant research - employment and industrial relations - this paper analyses the impact on their discipline and working environments of the journal rankings ERA processes. Overall, we can conclude that the ERA journal ranking system is strongly and negatively affecting the field and could lead to the diminution of the number of Australian journals and researchers, and the amount of Australian research, in this field. Such consequences would likely be harmful for social progress in Australia.

Journal Title

Australian Universities' Review

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

53

Issue

2

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© The Author(s) 2011. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this journal please refer to the publisher's website or contact the authors.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Education systems

Specialist studies in education

Industrial and employee relations

Education policy

Research, science and technology policy

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections