Suburban Destiny: Disrupting the Density Debate

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Accepted Manuscript (AM)

Author(s)
Burke, Matthew
Dodson, Jago
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

Brendan Gleeson and Beau B Beza

Date
2014
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Since the 1980's a 'great debate' has raged about the future of Australia's cities and the question of their density (Searle 2004: Forster 2006). In reality this was a continuation of a much longer struggle over the form and structure of human settlements and is tied to similar struggles in North America and elsewhere. Paul Mees' scholarly work (2000,2010) on the independent role of transport policy in urban transport and land-use patterns, and its disruption of the debate are the focus of this chapter. We consider the higher order questions of whether increases in density are necessary for transition towards sustainability and resilience, and what policy settings and institutional arrangements might be needed to provide better intervention and regulation of urbanisation and transport systems, as part of a shift towards a public city (See Gleeson and Beza, this volume).

Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title

The Public City: Essays in Honour of Paul Mees

Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2014 Melbourne University Press. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the publisher’s website for further information.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Transport Planning

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections