International study of definitions of English-language terms for suicidal behaviours: a survey exploring preferred terminology
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Goodfellow, Benjamin
Silverman, Morton
Berman, Alan
Mann, John
Arensman, Ella
Hawton, Keith
Phillips, MR
Vijayakumar, Lakshmi
Andriessen, Karl
Chavez-Hernandez, Ana-Maria
Heisel, Marnin
Kolves, Kairi
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
Objectives: Explore international consensus on nomenclatures of suicidal behaviours and analyse differences in terminology between high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Design: An online survey of members of the International Organisation for Suicide Prevention (IASP) used multiple-choice questions and vignettes to assess the four dimensions of the definition of suicidal behaviour: outcome, intent, knowledge and agency. Setting: International. Participants: Respondents included 126 individuals, 37 from 30 LMICs and 89 from 33 HICs. They included 40 IASP national representatives (65% response rate), IASP regular members (20% response rate) and six respondents from six additional countries identified by other organisations. Outcome measures: Definitions of English-language terms for suicidal behaviours. Results: The recommended definition of ‘suicide’ describes a fatal act initiated and carried out by the actors themselves. The definition of ‘suicide attempt’ was restricted to non-fatal acts with intent to die, whereas definition of ‘self-harm’ more broadly referred to acts with varying motives, including the wish to die. Almost all respondents agreed about the definitions of ‘suicidal ideation’, ‘death wishes’ and ‘suicide plan’. ‘Aborted suicide attempt’ and ‘interrupted suicide attempt’ were not considered components of ‘preparatory suicidal behaviour’. There were several differences between representatives from HICs and LMICs. Conclusion: This international opinion survey provided the basis for developing a transcultural nomenclature of suicidal behaviour. Future developments of this nomenclature should be tested in larger samples of professionals, including LMICs may be a challenge.
Journal Title
BMJ Open
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
11
Issue
2
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© Author(s) 2021. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Clinical sciences
Health services and systems
Public health
Other health sciences
Linguistics
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Psychology
Persistent link to this record
Citation
De Leo, D; Goodfellow, B; Silverman, M; Berman, A; Mann, J; Arensman, E; Hawton, K; Phillips, MR; Vijayakumar, L; Andriessen, K; Chavez-Hernandez, A-M; Heisel, M; Kolves, K, International study of definitions of English-language terms for suicidal behaviours: a survey exploring preferred terminology, BMJ Open, 2021, 11 (2), pp. e043409-e043409