It is argued that an inclusive approach to community-based projects is a sure way to guarantee its long-term success. While this paper supports this belief, it argues that the commissioned artist needs to see community as ‘the crucible for positive development’ (Goldbard, Arguments for cultural democracy and community cultural development Grantmakers in the Arts, p. 20, 2009). I believe that it is the responsibility of the artist to prepare the scene and identify a methodology that welcomes community engagement. The process in its entirety must be transparent and continually accessible. It is not enough to provide opportunities and avenues for bringing community into the collaborative team; the artist/project manager/art director must implement methodologies which build confidence and allow all participants an equal opportunity to contribute without bias. While confidence comes from awareness and familiarity, showcasing ongoing developments of the project beyond the collaborative team and out into the broader community will also work positively towards the success of the project, by strengthening community awareness and showcasing the skills of the participants. This chapter uses case studies to argue in support of this belief.