Experimental and archaeological testing with 3D laser scanning reveals the limits of I/TMC as a reduction index for global scraper and point studies

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Maloney, TR
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

The ability to accurately gauge the mass loss from production and resharpening of stone tools has wide-ranging implications for our understanding of early human history across the world. Recent advances in 3D laser scanning technology have facilitated unprecedented accuracy in surface area measurements of stone artefacts. This new methodology has been used to estimate flake mass, based on regression of platform surface area. This manuscript presents an analysis of ‘initial to terminal mass comparison’ using an experimental sample (n = 107) and tests empirical inferences on an archaeological assemblage (n = 400) from northern Australia. The experimental and archaeological assemblages were selected to reflect global occurrences of scrapers, convergent scrapers, and some points; making the critique of this reduction index one of global significance. The method cannot reasonably estimate the IM of all retouched flakes with intact platforms surfaces, without regression of flake subsets, reducing sample size, and greatly diminishing archaeological potential. Other reduction indices are suggested to be better suited to this task.

Journal Title

Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

29

Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)

ARC

Grant identifier(s)

FT170100025

Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Archaeology

Archaeological science

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Maloney, TR, Experimental and archaeological testing with 3D laser scanning reveals the limits of I/TMC as a reduction index for global scraper and point studies, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2020, 29, pp. 102068: 1-102068: 8

Collections