What are the benefits of longer training in psychology? A comment on Helmes and Wilmoth (2002)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Dyck, MJ
O'Donovan, A
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2003
Size

22263 bytes

File type(s)

application/pdf

Location
License
Abstract

Helmes and Wilmoth (2002) assert that the Australian model of educating psychologists is inadequate. They advocate adoption of the North American model. Their advocacy ignores the fact that the effectiveness of advanced professional training in psychology has not been demonstrated, and the fact that psychology practitioners from all parts of the world value supervised work with clients above formal courses as a positive influence on professional development. If we wish to increase the competence and effectiveness of psychologists, it is more appropriate that we restructure our entry-level education so that it emphasises real-world problem solving and hands-on work with clients than that we increase the duration of entry-level education.

Journal Title

Australian Psychologist

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

38

Issue

3

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2003 Taylor & Francis. This is the author-manuscript version of the paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Cognitive and computational psychology

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections