American Values or Human Rights? U.S. Foreign Policy and the Fractured Myth of Virtuous Power

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Kane, John
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

Georg C Edwards III, Susan A Mathews

Date
2003
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

American exceptionalism placed American values at the center of foreign policy, fostering belief in the essential union of American virtue and power. Developing a theme of Henry Kissinger's, this article argues that in Vietnam this union was severed and undermined: America's power was defeated and its virtue assailed. Nixon offered only a pretense of reunion. Carter attempted the real thing by putting universal human rights, not American values, at the heart of foreign policy. His failure was followed by Reagan's denial of sin and reassurance of American values, though the Gulf War of his successor had a deeper impact on the national psyche. Clinton's foreign policy remained subject to the "Vietnam syndrome" and he, despite rhetorical dazzle, developed no new consensus on the disposition of American power. September 11, however, produced a sense of injured innocence in whose defense American power could again be virtuously deployed. The subsequent patriotic surge encouraged George W. Bush to revive American values in foreign policy, with potentially dangerous consequences.

Journal Title

Presidential Studies Quarterly

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

33

Issue

4

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2003 Blackwell Publishing. The definitive version is available at [www.blackwell-synergy.com.]

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Political science

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections