A consideration of what is meant by automaticity and better ways to measure it

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Keatley, David A
Chan, Derwin KC
Caudwell, Kim
Chatzisarantis, Nikos LD
Hagger, Martin S
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2015
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract

A commentary on Predicting automaticity in exercise behaviour: the role of perceived behavioural control, affect, intention, action planning, and behaviour

by de Bruijn, G.-J., Gardner, B., van Osch, L., and Sniehotta, F. (2014). Int. J. Behav. Med. 21, 767–774. doi: 10.1007/s12529-013-9348-4

Journal Title

Frontiers in Psychology

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

5

Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2015 Keatley, Chan, Caudwell, Chatzisarantis and Hagger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Cognitive and computational psychology

Social Sciences

Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Psychology

implicit

implicit association test

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Keatley, DA; Chan, DKC; Caudwell, K; Chatzisarantis, NLD; Hagger, MS, A consideration of what is meant by automaticity and better ways to measure it, FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 5, pp. 1537

Collections