Inequalities of redress: Australia's national redress scheme for institutional abuse of children
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
The national redress scheme proposed by the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse is unique and unusual in the world of government redress. It is unique with its inclusion of both care leavers and non-care leavers (it is the only government scheme to do so), and it is unusual in focusing on sexual abuse alone (18% of government schemes do). These unique and unusual qualities come at a price for justice. Care leavers and non-care leavers are different groups with respect to their experiences of abuse and social status as child victims. Unless these group differences are explicitly recognised in guidelines for the monetary payment, care leavers will be disadvantaged. Two corrective measures are proposed: adopting an inclusive understanding of sexual abuse in closed and open settings, and addressing the negative bias that may result from care leavers’ lower social status as children compared to that of non-care leavers. Their lower status is likely to affect (that is, devalue) judgements of the severity and impact of abuse.
Journal Title
Journal of Australian Studies
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
42
Issue
2
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
ARC
Grant identifier(s)
DP170101470
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2018 Taylor & Francis (Routledge). This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Australian Studies on 17 Jun 2018, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/14443058.2018.1459783
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Criminology
Access to justice