Changing constitutions through 'deliberative voting': A new approach

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Levy, Ron
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2012
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

'Deliberative Voting' describes a new kind of constitutional referendum. It is a 'deliberative democratic' innovation, which means that it aims to solve one of the oldest tensions of democratic lawmaking - between robust citizen involvement and careful deliberation. While citizen participation in lawmaking is desirable, it is also usually problematic. Few people outside of government have the time or expertise for well-informed, rigorous and reflective deliberation over the making of new laws. Normally we therefore delegate lawmaking to parliaments, whose members we expect will be suitably informed. Yet the solution of delegation is increasingly untenable - and undesirable - in the unique case of constitutional lawmaking. Leaving voters out of a process of reform now attracts convincing charges that both the process and the constitution it yields are illegitimate. Back in 1901, Australia thus became the second country, after Switzerland, to make constitutional referendums mandatory. Since then, referendums on key constitutional amendments in Europe and elsewhere have become commonplace.

Journal Title

Pandora's Box

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

2012

Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note

After all reasonable attempts to contact the copyright owner, this work was published in good faith in interests of the digital preservation of academic scholarship. Please contact copyright@griffith.edu.au with any questions or concerns.

Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Law not elsewhere classified

Law

Other Law and Legal Studies

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections