The aim of this study was to investigate short- and long-term compensatory effects on dietary intake following high intensity interval training (HIIT) compared with usual care moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) during and following a cardiac rehabilitation program. This study investigates secondary outcomes of a clinical trial. Ninety-three participants with coronary artery disease enrolled in a 4-week cardiac rehabilitation program, were randomised to 1) 4x4-minute HIIT; or 2) 40-min of MICT (usual care). Patients were instructed to complete 3 weekly sessions (2 supervised, 1 home-based) for 4-weeks, and 3 weekly home-based sessions thereafter for another 48-weeks. Dietary intake was measured by telephone-based 24-h recall over 2 day at baseline, 4-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months. Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire was used to measure dietary behaviour and Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire used to measure food preferences. Appetite was assessed by a visual analogue scale and appetite-regulating hormones. There was no change over the study period or differences between groups for daily energy intake at 4-weeks or 12-months. There were also no group differences for any other measures of dietary intake, fasting hunger or appetite-related hormones, dietary behaviour, or food preferences. These findings suggest that compared to moderate intensity exercise, HIIT does not result in compensatory increases of energy intake or indicators of poor diet quality. This finding appears to be the same for patients with normal weight and obesity. HIIT can therefore be included in cardiac rehabilitation programs as an adjunct or alterative to MICT, without concern for any undesirable dietary compensation.