Quality assurance of assessment through consensus moderation: A reporting framework for institutional engagement
File version
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Francois Smit
Date
Size
220197 bytes
File type(s)
application/pdf
Location
Celtic Manor Resort, Newport, Wales
License
Abstract
This paper proposes a framework for Quality Assurance of Assessment. The framework: 尲ovides a common basis for institutions to implement, monitor and improve practices that ensure the quality of student learning and its assessment; 奮sures that academic standards are embedded in the institutional activities academics and students experience throughout their teaching and learning. i.e as an integral, systemic and axiomatic outcome, not through corrective action after-the-fact; 奮dorses processes that place responsibility and authority for expert judgment about the quality of students' learning firmly with the academics who are the experts in their fields; 峵pports intra and inter-institutional collegial exchange, that places the achievement of informed consensus at the heart of a system that achieves quality; 實fers an approach to cross-institutional benchmarking of standards, and; 夥livers numerical metrics that respect institutional and disciplinary differences, and yet yield meaningful comparative data.
Journal Title
Conference Title
Positive Futures for higher education; connections, communities and criticality
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© The Author(s) 2011. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this conference please refer to the conference’s website or contact the author.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Education Assessment and Evaluation